NEAT
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Our History
    • Our Team
    • News / Blog
  • Our Work
    • Phone Banks
    • Town Halls
    • Canvasses
  • Take Action
    • Equality Act Call In Day
    • Virtual Phone Bank >
      • EqualityTime - 2021
    • Host a Virtual Calling Party
    • Virtual Town Halls
  • Connect
    • Subscribe
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Contact
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Our History
    • Our Team
    • News / Blog
  • Our Work
    • Phone Banks
    • Town Halls
    • Canvasses
  • Take Action
    • Equality Act Call In Day
    • Virtual Phone Bank >
      • EqualityTime - 2021
    • Host a Virtual Calling Party
    • Virtual Town Halls
  • Connect
    • Subscribe
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Contact

NEAT Joins Supreme Court Brief Against Using Religion to Discriminate

8/24/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture

​Last week NEAT was proud to join the “friend of the court” brief authored by GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) for the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (see below for more information on the case). The brief clearly outlines the evolution of LGBTQ+ rights in the United States, and points out that the exemption sought by Catholic Social Services would have broad and breathtaking implications. Allowing discrimination against US citizens--even if based on religious beliefs--would be a dark turn for the country. This is especially true when the services in question are funded by taxpayers.

What is Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about?

On November 4, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case on whether religious organizations that receive public funds to provide foster services can use their religious beliefs to deny service to LGBTQ+ parents (and potentially others they “disagree” with like single parents, Jews and Catholics). The dispute itself is between the City of Philadelphia and Catholic Social Services, but the outcome will reverberate across the country. 
​
Philadelphia enters into contracts and provides public funds to a variety of agencies to provide foster care services for children in the welfare system. One of the standard clauses in a contract with the city is that a provider must comply with nondiscrimination ordinances adopted by the government. In 2018, Philadelphia learned that two of the agencies they contracted with refused to license same-sex couples to be foster parents claiming it would violate their religious beliefs.
​
Based on the violation, Philadelphia canceled the contract with Catholic Social Services, who then sued the city. The main contention is that the agency’s constitutional right to religious beliefs has more weight than the municipal nondiscrimination laws. This is one of the many battlegrounds in the evangelical campaign to carve out religious exemptions as a legal way to treat LGBTQ+ people as second class citizens.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

The Home of Collaborative Action and Partnerships for LGBTQ+ Justice
Picture
Privacy Policy